Editor’s Note
This article highlights concerns from Mexico’s business sector that proposed anti-money laundering regulations, while well-intentioned, may place a disproportionate compliance burden on small and medium-sized enterprises. The debate underscores the ongoing challenge of balancing effective financial oversight with fostering a supportive environment for business operations.

The Mexican Employers’ Confederation (Coparmex) warned that the overregulation of the anti-money laundering law approved by the Senate could affect the daily operations of micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs).
According to the employers’ organization, micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises constitute 99 percent of Mexico’s productive fabric.
Coparmex pointed out that the amendments to combat money laundering require companies to identify and know all their clients through official documentation and, in the case of legal entities, to collect detailed information about the beneficiaries.
Additionally, the anti-money laundering law mandates monitoring and reporting of operations, which expands the universe of transactions subject to scrutiny by the Tax Administration Service (SAT).
The business organization indicated that the implementation of this initiative would imply a significant investment in technological infrastructure, constant staff training, and hiring of external services to ensure execution.
It emphasized that the development or acquisition of systems capable of identifying transactions that do not conform to the transactional profile and generating reports in the formats required by the authority requires resources that are not within everyone’s reach.
Additionally, fines could exceed 7.3 million pesos, or even amounts equivalent to 100 percent of the operation.
The elimination of the requirement to prove intent in some cases opens the door to automatic criminal liability.
It asserted that for any regulation to be effective, it requires technical support, graduality, and sensitivity to the business environment.
Many economic units registered as vulnerable activities still do not fully comply with the LFPIORPI.
The employers’ union proposed a proportional, staggered model with incentives to facilitate compliance, especially for MSMEs.
