【Paris, Franc】Louvre Heist: Thieves’ Escape Could Have Been Prevented “Within 30 Seconds”

Editor’s Note

An official investigation has revealed that a 30-second window to apprehend the thieves behind the Louvre jewel heist was missed, highlighting a critical lapse in the security response.

Cambriolage du Louvre : la fuite des voleurs aurait pu être empêchée «à 30 secondes près»
Administrative Investigation Confirms Narrow Miss

An administrative investigation confirmed this Wednesday that the escape of the thieves who stole jewels from the Louvre in Paris on October 19 could have been prevented within thirty seconds, according to hearings held at the Senate.

“Within 30 seconds, the agents of (the private security company) Securitas or the police could have prevented the thieves’ escape,”

declared Noël Corbin, Inspector General of Cultural Affairs and one of the report’s authors.

From the beginning of the hearings, senators insisted on the importance of those few seconds that could have changed the outcome of the heist. The president of the Senate’s culture commission, Laurent Lafon, recalled that

“the report shows that within thirty seconds, the burglars could have been arrested and the loot recovered.”

He also emphasized that

“these few seconds are important. If the recommendations of the audits had been implemented, these thirty seconds would have been recovered.”

The rapporteurs also stressed that the theft was not the result of a string of bad luck. Laurent Lafon estimated that this burglary

“is not a fortuitous failure”

and

“is not due to an accumulation of bad luck, but rather to decisions that were not taken to ensure security.”

These conclusions are based on several prior audits whose findings were consistent.

Live Surveillance Footage Not Monitored

The precise sequence of the theft was traced using surveillance cameras. Pascal Mignerey, from the Security, Safety, and Audit Mission at the Ministry of Culture, detailed that the exterior camera

“clearly filmed the arrival of the thieves, the installation of the platform, the ascent of the two thieves to the balcony and, a few minutes later, their hasty departure.”

But the footage was not monitored live, and when a security control room agent activated it, the perpetrators had already left the Apollo Gallery.

The technical explanations provided to senators describe a video surveillance system incapable of providing real-time alerts. Laurent Lafon specified that

“the camera that was working and filming the platform did not appear on the security PC screen. It took several minutes to decide to retrieve and activate the footage. Regarding this camera, we are dealing with obsolete equipment that is truly not suited to security requirements.”

For the officials deployed that night, these failures represented lost time that was impossible to recover.

2019 Audit Had Identified Weaknesses in Apollo Gallery

Senators also highlighted internal disorganization concerning the management of security audits. According to Noël Corbin, investigators were

“very surprised”

by

“the problem of transmitting security audits”

within the museum during the change of presidency in 2021, upon the arrival of Laurence des Cars. An audit conducted in 2019 by the jeweler Van Cleef & Arpels, which had identified all the weaknesses of the Apollo Gallery, had notably not been communicated to the new management.

Despite these flaws, some officials managed to limit the risks around the site. Noël Corbin indicated that

“the intervention of security agents around the museum and in the areas near the Louvre helped to avoid the worst.”

However, the report’s conclusions fit into a severe assessment: for Laurent Lafon, they point to

“the general failure of the museum as well as its supervisory body in taking security issues into account.”
88 Million Euros in Damages

On the judicial front, the amount of economic damage was specified by the Paris prosecutor Laure Beccuau. She declared:

“The damage was estimated by the Louvre’s curator at 88 million euros,”

a sum

“extremely spectacular”

but which

“has nothing parallel and comparable to the historical damage,”

adding that the criminals

“will not gain”

this sum

“if they had the very bad idea of melting these jewels.”

The day after the heist, the Minister of Culture Rachida Dati ordered an administrative investigation and announced several

“emergency measures,”

including the installation of

“anti-intrusion”

devices around the museum. These decisions were validated during an emergency board meeting, but they have not appeased the unions, who are still waiting for staff reinforcements while the museum faces a gallery closure due to damage and a call for a strike by staff.

Hearings at the Senate will continue. The commission must hear the former president of the Louvre, Jean-Luc Martinez, whose term (2013-2021) saw the completion of security audits now described as alarming. His successor Laurence des Cars will then be heard. For the senators, the challenge is now to establish the chain of responsibilities that led to losing those thirty decisive seconds, which have become the symbol of a weakened security system within the world’s most visited museum.

Full article: View original |
⏰ Published on: December 10, 2025