【USA】’Unclear’ US Diamond Rules Signal Move to Traceability

Editor’s Note

New U.S. import requirements for diamonds, mandating a “country of mining” declaration from April 2025, aim to enhance supply chain transparency. While this signals a significant push for traceability, the industry faces unanswered questions regarding implementation and compliance.

A display at a jewelry store in Hong Kong image
New Requirements and Industry Reaction

New requirements to state the “country of mining” when importing diamonds into the US, effective from April 2025, have left many questions unanswered and signal a push for greater traceability in the diamond trade.

Rollout and Ambiguity

The rules were announced by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in stages, with a notice on October 22, 2024, and a Trade User Information Notice updated on January 14, 2025. The details remain unclear, including whether the 0.50-carat threshold from the US ban on Russian diamonds applies, as suggested in a letter from shipping company Malca-Amit, though this is not officially confirmed.

Lack of Detail and Evidence Requirements

CBP has not specified evidence requirements, though industry members believe self-certification will continue with a higher chance of authorities requesting documentation. What constitutes reliable proof of origin, such as whether a Kimberley Process certificate is sufficient, remains undefined.

“This certainly puts the onus on importers to have evidence lest they want to be penalized for making false statements,” said Brad Brooks-Rubin, a partner at legal advisory firm Arktouros and a former senior adviser to the Office of Sanctions Coordination at the US State Department.
Industry Confusion and Seeking Clarification

The documents are confusing, with the October notice referencing “diamonds and diamond jewelry,” while the January document lists “diamond imports” and “imports of jewelry that exclude diamonds,” leaving the status of finished diamond jewelry unspecified.

“The documents as published are so unclear that we need answers to a number of questions before we can [provide guidance],” said Sara Yood, CEO and general counsel of the Jewelers Vigilance Committee (JVC), in an email. She added that JVC had filed a comment about the “country of mining origin definition not being accurate for the jewelry trade,” which “seemingly was never addressed or published.”

CBP defines “country of mining” as “where the diamonds were mined, extracted, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part.” Yood noted that this terminology differs from trade usage, and clarity is lacking.

Context and Unanswered Questions

CBP and the State Department had not responded to requests for comment by press time. The industry awaits further guidance as the April 2025 implementation date approaches.

US and Indian flags image
Full article: View original |
⏰ Published on: February 04, 2025