Editor’s Note
This article examines the recent surge in precious metal prices, questioning whether it signals a genuine loss of confidence in major currencies or reflects market hype. It introduces the concept of speculative trades, like the “TACO trade,” to illustrate how political narratives can influence investment trends.

The surge in precious metal prices has apparently triggered a return of this form of investment that anticipates the loss of value of major currencies, particularly the dollar. But is this phenomenon not exaggerated?
The stock market is full of sometimes somewhat cryptic expressions. As an example, take the famous “TACO trade”, the acronym TACO referring to “Trump always chickens out”, or “Trump always ends up backing down”. In short, it involves anticipating the idea that in the end, behind the US president’s fierce threats, a negotiated solution always emerges.
In recent months, one expression has persistently returned: the “debasement trade”. This term refers to market bets around the loss of value of major currencies. Rather than investing in securities denominated in these currencies, operators focus on “tangible” assets, like commodities.
Historically, this phenomenon has already occurred several times, notably in the 70s. In 1971, US President Nixon declared the end of the gold standard, i.e., the convertibility of the dollar into a certain amount of gold. The Kingston Agreements in 1976 then sealed the end of the gold standard worldwide.
The market specialist points out that other episodes of this kind occurred in 2008 and then 2020, each time when monetary and fiscal policies were ultra-accommodative, leading to significant money creation.
This expression has come back into fashion for about five to six months. The sharp rise in silver and gold, which gained 148% and 65% respectively in 2025, and 19% and 13% in January, has been interpreted by several market experts as a signal showing a “debasement trade” around the dollar and dollar-denominated assets.
This interpretation is notably that of Swissquote, which sees it as “the strong return of the ‘debasement trade'”.
In October, John Plassard noted that US public debt had reached “historic highs while European deficits are bogged down”. As for central banks, if their rhetoric proves restrictive, in reality real interest rates “struggle to become positive again,” wrote John Plassard.
Barclays for its part noted at the end of January that the “debasement trade” had “hit” the dollar and Japanese bonds,
particularly with the massive fiscal stimulus plan of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi.
If this “debasement trade” therefore seems palpable, does it reflect a genuine loss of confidence in currencies? And is its importance not exaggerated?
While some analysts therefore clearly see the existence of this market phenomenon, others are a bit more cautious.
