【Paris, Franc】Louvre Heist: Thieves Could Have Been Arrested ‘Within 30 Seconds,’ According to Administrative Investigation

Editor’s Note

A recent investigation reveals that the thieves who stole eight Crown Jewels from the Louvre in October could have been apprehended within seconds, exposing critical security lapses at the iconic museum.

Louvre: «À 30 secondes près, les agents Securitas ou les policiers auraient pu empêcher la fuite des voleurs», explique Noël Corbin
A Missed Arrest by Seconds

According to an administrative investigation, the thieves who broke into the Louvre on October 19th, making off with 8 Crown Jewels, could have been arrested “within thirty seconds.” On December 10th, before the Senate’s cultural commission, the rapporteurs from the General Inspectorate of Cultural Affairs (Igac) and the Ministry’s Security Mission (Missa) presented a damning account of the few minutes that plunged the Parisian museum into horror.

Outdated and Insufficient Equipment

According to the investigators, who conducted a two-week administrative inquiry following the heist, security agents and managers acted as they could, following established protocols. However, outdated and insufficient equipment—an obsolete security PC, only five exterior cameras, an inadequately secured French window, unreplaced protective grilles—led to the disaster.

“The information given to the neighboring police station should have been more precise,” and, undoubtedly, the thieves would have been arrested.
“The police car first went to the Carrousel du Louvre before realizing the theft was happening on the Quai François-Mitterrand side. Upon arrival, it even crossed paths, unknowingly, with the thieves on a motorcycle,” explained Noël Corbin, head of the Igac.
Live Feed Not Monitored

Worse, an exterior camera “perfectly filmed the arrival of the thieves, the installation of the nacelle, the ascent of the two thieves to the balcony and, a few minutes later, their hasty departure,” recounted Pascal Mignerey of the Missa. But these images were not watched live due to a lack of sufficient screens. When a security agent zoomed in,

“it was already too late since the thieves had left the Galerie d’Apollon.”
Underestimation of Theft Risk

According to the rapporteurs, these dysfunctions stem from years of underestimating security risks. Pressed by senators, the rapporteurs attempted to clarify the security and safety policy implemented at the Louvre over the past eight years. It appears to be one of “stop-and-go,” against a backdrop of long administrative delays, poor internal organization, and an in-house culture focused on visitors rather than the state of security PCs.

A Security Master Plan Stalled

Thus, a security master plan was launched in 2017-2018 by the museum’s former president, Jean-Luc Martinez. Studies and investments were set up against the backdrop of the “Yellow Vests” crisis and Covid. In 2021, this plan was called into question by Laurence des Cars, Martinez’s successor.

“The 2017 master plan is not complete. She considers its level of ambition insufficient and wants to strengthen it, notably by creating 5 command posts,” recalled Noël Corbin. “The process was then frozen, reworked, and presented to the board of directors in 2023.”

Procurements were launched in 2024-2025, for implementation beginning in 2026.

“A fundamental overhaul did not exempt from implementing urgent security measures,” assured Noël Corbin.
A 2018 Report That Foreshadowed the Heist

In 2018, the jeweler Van Cleef & Arpels, as part of a skills-based sponsorship, had written a report on security in the Galerie d’Apollon. It highlighted the gallery’s vulnerability to theft, notably pointing out the presence of an easily reachable balcony and French windows without bulletproof glass. In retrospect, this audit almost appears like a manual for the October 19th heist.

“How is it that this document was not in the hands of Laurence des Cars, who says she only learned of it after the theft?” asked Laurent Lafon, the commission’s president.
Lack of Information Handover

The answer, according to the Igac, is clear: there was no “handover” between the two presidents, nor a proper transfer of authority.

“The Louvre’s archiving systems are insufficient, and the change in management teams did not facilitate matters,” estimated Noël Corbin, who speaks of an absence of institutional memory within the museum.

With its 244,000 square meters over 37 hectares, it is not only a “city” but also works in silos, with departments and directions acting without necessarily communicating. As for the Ministry of Culture, which, as the overseeing authority, could have played a cementing role, it also did not properly fulfill its contract.

Calls for Urgent Action

The administrative investigation report includes a number of recommendations, including the obvious need to upgrade equipment and the already-approved creation of a security coordinator position within the museum.

“Security must become a major priority,” insisted the rapporteurs before the national representation.

According to them, the €80 million in investments on this topic announced as part of the Louvre Renaissance major works must be released without delay.

Full article: View original |
⏰ Published on: December 10, 2025