Editor’s Note
This analysis highlights the persistent “K-shaped” divergence in economic recovery and cautions against premature strategic shifts in commodity investments, underscoring the ongoing volatility in financial markets.
(Seoul=Yonhap News) Reporter Kim Yoo-hyang — “The ‘K-shaped flow’ continues in an environment where the real economy has not sufficiently recovered. A premature shift to copper could be risky,” said Hwang Byung-jin, head of the FICC Research Department at NH Investment & Securities.
Hwang advised that the recent sharp fluctuations in precious metal prices are merely a speed adjustment, not a change in direction, and it is not yet time to abandon gold. Recently selected as the ‘Best Analyst’ in the Commodities & Alternative Assets category at the Yonhap Infomax Financial Awards, Hwang emphasized that the real economy must strengthen overall for a full-scale capital shift to industrial metals like copper to occur.
He noted that the copper/gold ratio, which measures the relative performance of the risky asset copper and the safe-haven asset gold, has maintained a downward trend even after the recent gold price correction. “In this environment, the relatively stable commodity is still seen as gold,” he said.
— You gained attention for predicting last year’s surge in precious metal prices. What perspective do you prioritize when analyzing commodity markets?
He added that while stock markets are hitting record highs and the IMF recently upgraded its economic growth forecast, he always verifies if this optimism is correct. NH Investment & Securities has maintained a stance since Q4 2024 to focus on metals, particularly gold, silver, and copper, over energy in its commodity portfolio.
— The sharp drop in gold and silver prices in late January shocked global asset markets. What do you see as the fundamental cause?
He explained that gold rose about 70% last year and silver about 150%. Even in January this year, gold rose 25% and silver nearly 70%, so it was a warning about speed. The market needed a breather, and the trigger was U.S. President Donald Trump nominating hawkish former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair.
— Some speculate that exchange authorities intentionally moved to lower prices.
He believes these “triggers” led to profit-taking demand for gold and silver on the last day of January, but they were not factors for a directional change.
— The environment supporting gold’s rise includes real interest rates, dollar trust, and central bank demand. How long can this last?
— Domestic retail investors who invested as gold surged must have been shocked by the recent plunge. Is it a situation to be reassured about now?
He sees no material yet to change gold’s direction. Gold is both a safe-haven and inflation hedge asset. Even if Jerome Powell’s term ends in May and Kevin Warsh leads the Fed, the outlook for a monetary easing bias hasn’t changed. With expectations for at least two rate cuts this year remaining, he judges the gold price rise cycle is not over.
— Some advise it’s time to focus on non-ferrous metals rather than gold or silver. Is there a change in commodity investor trends?
— Public interest in commodity investment has grown with the gold surge. Any advice?
— What is an appropriate commodity allocation in a portfolio for the general public?
— Domestic gold prices include a ‘Kimchi Premium’. There are also commissions and exchange rates to consider. What’s the most advantageous investment method?
— At what stage are current gold, silver, and copper prices?